Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Opposing cell type preferences for binding and replication shape influenza A virus infection in human airways
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.04.722582
Figure Lengend Snippet: A) BEpC from donor 2 were infected with control H1N1 WSN/1933 virus or recombinant 7+1 viruses containing 7 genes from the WSN/1933 strain and either the HA- or NA-encoding segment of Hawaii/70/2019, or of Duck/Alberta/35/1976. An MOI as calculated by titres determined on MDCK cells of 0.5-1 was used for the recombinant strains, and an MOI of 5 was used for the control WSN/1933 strain to achieve comparable infection rates. At 7 hours post-infection (hpi), the cells were fixed and stained for viral nucleoproteins (anti-NP antibody), ciliated cells (microtubule dye), tight junctions (anti-ZO-1 antibody), and nuclei (DAPI). The infections were quantified as the percentage of NP-positive cells relative to all apical cells and normalized to the total infected cell populations. B) – G) BEpC from donor 1-3 were trypsinized and stained for cell surface markers identifying ciliated cells (microtubules), basal cells (CD271), secretory cells (CD66c), α2,3-linked sialic acids (Maackia amurensis II lectins; MALII), and α2,6-linked sialic acids (Sambucus nigra lectins; SNA). The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, cellular doublets were excluded by size, and dead cells with a cell viability marker. One repeat was previously published in . B) and E) show the percentage of α2,3-linked and α2,6-linked sialic acid-positive cells, respectively. C) and F) show the median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the BV421 staining of α2,3-linked and α2,6-linked sialic acids, respectively. D) and G) show the MFI of the BV421 staining of α2,3-linked and α2,6-linked sialic acids, respectively, of pre-gated sialic acid-positive cells. The data of donors 1-3 were pooled and distinguished by symbol shape: donor 1 (square), donor 2 (triangle), donor 3 (circle). H) – I) BEpC from donor 2 were stained prior to trypsinization for apical H) α2,3-linked sialic acids (MALII) and I) α2,6-linked sialic acid (SNA), as well as ciliated cells (microtubule dye). The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, cellular doublets were excluded by size, and dead cells with a cell viability marker. Shown is the MFI of the apical sialic acid staining on ciliated versus non-ciliated cells, pre-gated for sialic acid-positive cells. J) - L) BEpC from donor 2 were precooled on ice, and 6.4*10^9 viral copies of K) Duck/Alberta/35/1976 or L) Hawaii/70/2019 were added apically on ice. 1 hour post addition, the cells were fixed and stained for apically bound viral particles (anti-HA antibody), ciliated cells (microtubule dye), tight junctions (anti-ZO-1 antibody), and nuclei (DAPI). Quantification of apically bound viral signal. The summed viral signal volume on ciliated and non-ciliated apical cells was normalized to the viral signal present on all apical cells. J) Representative microscopy images of the mock-treated and Duck/Alberta/35/1976-treated sample are shown. The white arrows highlight the viral HA staining on a cell, shown with and without the cilia staining. In A), and H) - L), data represent means ± s.d. from n≥3 independent experiments. In B) – G) data represent means ± s.d. from n = 3 independent experiments per donor (donor 1-3). Statistical significance was determined in A) using two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test, in B) – G) using RM one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, and in H) – I) and K) – L) using an unpaired t-test. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001.
Article Snippet: Primary human bronchial epithelial cells (BEpC) were purchased from Epithelix (#EP51AB).
Techniques: Infection, Control, Virus, Recombinant, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Marker, Microscopy